Functional, yes. Attractive, no.

,

My husband comes from a long line of thrifty New Englanders who didn’t buy new if the old could be fixed.

The man who doesn’t blink at paying $200 for dinner refused to replace our broken mailbox pole and opted to piece it back together instead.

Sigh…

.

.

Yes, it worked.

.

.

Though it certainly isn’t pretty.

Could he have trimmed the wood to fit the pole’s width?

He could have.

.

.

He also could have bought a new mailbox to replace the twisted mess that drunk driver left behind, but no…

.

.

He glued and screwed and deployed his giant antique vise instead.

.

.

Does the door open completely? No.

Is there a gap in the rear where rain can leak in? Sure.

Is the pole crooked and listing slightly to the right? Yes.

.

.

But he didn’t have to buy a new one, and isn’t that all that counts?

🥴

24 thoughts on “Functional, yes. Attractive, no.”

  1. When I was in high school, a friend backed over someone’s mailbox after dropping him off at home. The pole was bent, so the bent section was cut off and it was just shorter. Whenever I ride past that house I remember that story from over 50 years ago. Throwing the pole and box away would have thrown the memory out with them – not that having your mailbox hit in the middle of the night makes an equivalent memory..

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m always intrigued by the differences between the Husband and me in terms of the things we’re willing to shell out for and the things we absolutely will not shell out for. This is the stuff of many marital arguments, methinks. And not just for us…
    For the record, it looks pretty good.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Uh uh….no way. That “tilt” would keep me awake at night. Cupcake would wake up at 0200 hrs. and find I was out there fixing it, plumb and all. “Functional” is not enough. Got to think about the aesthetics.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment