.
Trust me, you really can’t.
.
.
See?
That’s the very definition of useless news.
.
.
Man, I hate when that happens.
.
.
I admit I’m out of touch enough that I had to look up what hosing glizzies even was.
.
.
I can’t imagine any drugged fueled high being worth that. .
.
.
Government efficiency.
No more free Kit Kats for you!
.
.
Did she?
I think the jury is still out on that one…
🥴
.
.
I only have one thing to say.
Grow up gentlemen.
.
River's world..... 
I had to look up that ridiculous word, too, though I couldn’t find a definition for “hosing.” From the context, I assume it means “eating.” These News You Can’t Use pieces not only highlight how out of touch I am, they also make me so incredibly grateful that I’m so out of touch.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Entertainment and enlightenment, that’s my goal.
😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are we all out of touch, and is Rivergirl responsible for keeping us informed? I read it as “grizzlies” (as did she, unless Spellcheck changed it for her) and had to look twice to see it said “glizzies”. Then I looked that up and found glizzies noted as slang for both hot dog and Glock (as in handgun). I’d say eating your Glock is much more quickly fatal than eating hot dogs. But I wonder how a grizzly would react to turning a hose on it. I suspect a gentle spray on a hot day would be welcomed, very high pressure would drive it away, and a jet stream from a garden hose could annoy it to the point of being fatal (for you).
LikeLiked by 4 people
Spellcheck preferred grizzlies, and you’re right… no one in their right mind would hose those.
😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I disagree… grizzlies like playing in small waterfalls (catching salmon) and would probably enjoy an aggressive jet spray. I do not intend to test my theory.
LikeLiked by 2 people
After that bold assertion, I was really hoping you were going to offer to prove it. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
A Grizzlie’s reaction to eating a Glock would be heavily dependent on the caliber…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not even going to say what the photo of the Futurism story put me in mind of – which includes the phrase in question –
LikeLiked by 2 people
🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aren’t chaps crotchless by definition? Is Rita just wearing them without pants (trousers to you in the UK) under them? That’s nothing new, at least for men. When I lived in San Francisco in the 80s, it was fairly common in my neighborhood.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Grow up, indeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is the first News You Can’t Use post that had left me feeling ill…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Happy to help.
LikeLiked by 1 person
First Medicare, now Kit-Kats. Is nothing sacred?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not to this administration.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Way back in the 90s, a friend had taken ecstacy and it was peaking as someone offered him ‘Special K’ (ketamine), causing him to say yes to trying it (he’d never done it before). He was promised ‘a baby bump’ but tripped ball for over 12 hours – largely unable to talk for most of tgat time. When he finally came down, all he would say is, “I can’t imagine how fucked up you have to be to find that fun.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ll stick to my margaritas…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I heard about the sex toy incident – such stupidity is unfortunately on the rise – I blame (well, you know who I blame)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hear that.
LikeLike
Whoa whoa….Wait a minute on that last one. Since the WNBA is wall-to-wall lezzies, how do you know these toys were thrown by men? MEN do not go to WNBA games.
LikeLike
They were men…
“… Delbert Carver was booked for disorderly conduct, public indecency/indecent exposure and criminal trespass after allegedly throwing a sex toy at the Atlanta Dream’s stadium Saturday. And 18-year-old Kaden Lopez was arrested in Phoenix on suspicion of disorderly conduct, assault and public display of explicit sexual material. According to the local FOX station, Lopez told police he saw the viral trend on social media and purchased his own green sex toy.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
They were males.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed.
LikeLike