Uncategorized

News you can’t use.

43 Comments

.

Useless, but addicting… no?

.

.

This is the very definition of useless news.

.

.

See? You could have gone all day without knowing that.

.

.

I think the cross makes this outfit. Nothing like piety like a good circumboob.

.

.

If you’re going to lay out a veritable plant buffet, you have to expect random nibblers.

.

.

I, on the other hand… do not.

.

.

Adhesive?

And it sticks to… what?

Hard pass.

.

43 thoughts on “News you can’t use.”

  5. Today’s news featured a noose in a movie theater concession area, eating trash. It left peacefully.

    I’ve always heard sea cucumber self defense described as “vomiting up their insides”. I’ve never had one do it.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

      1. I live in MO and agree 💯! My oldest son was stationed in Alaska 4 years. I was walking my little grandson and a moose was on our path. I had GREAT respect for its power. I have little respect for the boob lol

        Liked by 1 person

  10. Tearing the butt to ward off predators? That is a three tequila comment.
    The cross and the circumboob? I think someone missed a few fine points of scripture concerning modest dressing.
    Moose in buildings? A regular occurrences in moose country.
    Stretchy sticky stuff on boobs? Nothing like goo and sand to make a girl feel pretty
    Sticky thong? Same problem with sand, and an uncomfortable way to hide camel toe. But then, what price beauty?

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Just saying, but where in scripture does it say sexual parts are to be covered up? Men made up those rules, no one else. And why? Because their bodies react to seeing a naked woman, and most of them are afraid to publicly show what hangs between their legs.
      Or maybe it was women, as I understand a lot of women think male parts are uglier than sin? Modesty is greatly overrated.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. Why do you think God fashioned nice leather suit for Adam and a chic a-line leather dress for Eve? Was it because they were naked and knew it?
        Actually, the older scriptures talk a lot about covering the genitals.
        In Pauls letter to Timothy, he did say immodest dress was in too much bling and fancy hairdo’s. But we do have a lot of data on historical dress of that period. Women covered up, and so did men … and Paul, being a rabbi and a pharisee, would certainly be aware of that …

        Like

      6. I have no memory of the Bible directing people to be modest in their attire. Been a while (50 years) since I last read it. Does that make me a coward? Not sure I can follow your line of reasoning.

        Liked by 1 person

  11. Oh golly – I’m just way too old. I feel like the moose. Do they want seamless throng underwear for mooses? What is the plural of moose? Meese? Okay it’s Monday morning and even two cups of coffee isn’t cutting it!

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  12. Actually, the Bible has many references to modesty, especially in the old testament. It was also the teaching in the 1st Century Church. But since your position is that the bible is written by man and not God, there is no point in arguing with you.
    The woman with circumboob and a resurrection cross is not modestly dressed and would not have been considered properly dressed in 1440 BCE nor would she have been considered modest in 2000 CE, nor would she be considered modestly dressed today. She would be asked to leave the synagogue, and she would be asked to leave the church.
    BTW. Not having ‘chops’ means you lack the knowledge and skill and has nothing to do with cowardice.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s